cheap nike free run 2 australia aar

ï»\xBF'So far only the constitutional norms, there is no specific laws and regulations to support implementation. Worse, the 1998 revised' Land Management Law ', a reversal of 10 years ago, according to constitutional amendments revised' Land Management Law 'relevant state-owned, collective land can be legally correct representation of the transfer, but is written the word 'transfer of collective land can not be used for non-agricultural purposes' (hereinafter pick a 'but', opened bankruptcy township enterprises can transfer a small hole) .? regardless of other state-owned land transfer such a restriction it again later, 'Managing Constructive land' under the premise can try to use control transfer (not a national universal) formulation also appeared Let me ask: state-owned land has commercial land before transferring this saying? If we add this one year, the land auction in Shenzhen, also come under the first hammer it? What is it to the original piece of land? Conditions before allowed to transfer, no one to be called operational, as are the allocation of national mandatory planning, allocation of land, piece of land which can operate? constitutional amendment in 1988, is to be allocated to the instruction of the transfer market. Why not this reliable the experience of starting to put so much detail into devil possession, looks convincing, virtually lost its basic direction of reform. so the state-owned land may transfer, collective land may not be transferred, they constructed a 'uncompleted' reform project, the crucial point is that the allocation of land resources, to become only the hands of the government of the land market before farmers collective land it? Sorry, we can not have to sign into the hands of the government. the land mode, efficiency of resource allocation fair income distribution and the two basic aspects, the negative consequences of growing, reform must be. else aside, why are so many corrupt officials sacked 'involving earth?' institutional rent-seeking space is large enough to keep track of. Therefore, the fundamental problem is not it, that a little thing twigs last years, but the implementation of constitutional norms, 'the same rights before the law the same way.' to see the 1988 amendment to the Constitution has been the past 26 years, if the experience proves that amendment inappropriate expression of constitutional norms, it is the first revision of the amendment. otherwise, let the Constitution and specific laws, regulations and policies