cheap nike free run 2 6pm

Shao Kun district attorney involved in court proceedings. September 9, 2013, Shao Kun District in Guangzhou Dongshan Hotel Guangdong A181 photographed at official car allegedly private, then he reported to the Inspectorate. May 26, 2014, Shao Kun district submit written information to the Inspectorate disclosure request to open the matter of identification results and other information. June 10, 2014, making this book Supervision Bureau, said the district Shao Kun on September 10, 2013 reporting was transferred Municipal Trade and Industry Bureau September 18, 2013. Specific investigation and verification issues and other processing conditions, in accordance with relevant provisions of the 'Regulations on Open Government Information', it is proposed to apply to the district Shao Kun Industry and Commerce Bureau. District Shao Kun think, pursuant to section 17 of the 'Regulations on Open Government Information,' provides Inspectorate as supervision and law enforcement authorities, shall perform statutory duties in accordance with the law and is obliged to deal with the specific circumstances of the investigation and verification to inform the plaintiff, rather than turn City Trade and Industry Bureau, supervision Bureau therefore did not fulfill the statutory duties illegal. Therefore, the paper petition Shao Kun District Supervision Bureau to court. June 12, 2014, Industrial and Commercial Bureau to 'Reply' said that after verification, the Department of Trade and Industry, Guangdong A181 vehicle official car, the second car is filed by individual vehicle approval and the consent of the competent authorities of the non-official vehicles . Car applicant in accordance with the requirements of the bus managed to handle the application formalities and payment of a car car costs, in line with official vehicle use regulations, it does not exist to deal with the problem. Thus, the district Shao Kun Original name of this car was the driver's position and other information, does not belong to government information should be disclosed, Trade and Industry Bureau decided not to open. Yuexiu District Court found that supervision bureau upon receipt of an application area Shao Kun, in accordance with current regulations and understanding of the situation to reply within the statutory time limit to inform inappropriate. About District Supervision Bureau Shao Kun claimed that its report did not fulfill the statutory duties to investigate the issue, the court held that the jurisdiction of the case does not belong to government information disclosure of the case, the court ultimately dismissed the district Shao Kun. After a trial, the district Shao Kun appealed against the verdict. Yesterday the case in Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court of second instance court. Court, Shao Kun district attorney would insist that the Inspectorate shall perform supervisory duties, public information. (Original title: Area Shao Kun v Supervision Bureau Case